Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1997:65 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court allows compensation for construction delays caused by nature protection ban under section 18(2).

Numero d'incarto KHO:1997:65
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court ruled that construction costs incurred due to delays caused by a nature protection ban must be compensated. The applicants argued they had met construction deadlines before the ban and intended to use or rent the buildings during the ban period. The court held that these specific costs qualify for compensation under the relevant nature protection law provision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Luonnonsuojelulain 18 § 2 mom; Costs incurred by applicants due to construction delays caused by a nature protection ban are compensable if the applicants were able to complete construction before the ban and intended to use the buildings during the ban period.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
nature protection ban construction delay compensation property rights restriction administrative compensation building permit delay spese di ristrutturazione spese di urbanizzazione idoneità all'edificazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Luonnonsuojelulain 18 § 2 mom
Generato dall'IA
admin_1993_water-superior__231
Administrative court dismisses claim for specific performance and allows partial compensation for structural damage caused by water level rise.
admin_1996_turku-and-pori-county__339
Construction court allowed work on building permit pending appeal due to changed circumstances.
admin_2013_aland__22
Administrative court dismisses appeal when building permit authority ignores neighbor hearing rights under Åland planning law.
kho-other_2017_4109
Appeal dismissed; late response ignored, and planning authority members not biased by store interests.
kho-other_2026_658
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against administrative court dismissal of building relocation order based on private contract dispute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Hakijat olivat alueelle luonnonsuojelulain 18 §:n 2 momentin nojalla määrätyn toimenpidekiellon voimassaoloaikana estyneet käyttämästä kiinteistöjään heille ennen toimenpidekiellon antamista myönnettyjen rakennuslupien mukaiseen lomarakentamiseen. Tästä rakentamisen viivästymisestä hakijoille aiheutuneita kustannuksia, ottaen huomioon, että hakijat olisivat kiellon voimassaoloaikana ehtineet rakentaa lomarakennukset ja käyttää niitä itse tai vuokrata rakennukset ainakin osaksi kiellon voimassaoloaikaa, oli pidettävä laadultaan sellaisina kustannuksina, jotka mainitun säännöksen mukaan oli hakijoille korvattava.

LuonnonsuojeluL 18 § 2 mom (71/23)