Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1997:58 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court quashed alcohol license denial for erotic restaurant based on purpose principle under Alcohol Act.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1997:58
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court quashed the Product Supervision Centre's refusal of an alcohol license for an erotic restaurant. The Centre had denied the license because the restaurant's concept allegedly failed the suitability requirement of Section 21(3) of the Alcohol Act. The Court ruled that this suitability requirement only justifies denial if the purpose is to prevent harms listed in Section 1 by regulating consumption, which was not the case here.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Alcohol Act 1989, Section 1; Section 21(3): The requirement of suitability under Section 21(3) of the Alcohol Act applies only when the purpose is to prevent harms listed in Section 1 by regulating consumption.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
alcohol license denial purpose principle suitability requirement erotic restaurant consumption regulation principio di precauzione garanzia di un'attività irreprensibile etica imprenditoriale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Alcohol Act 1989, Section 1
Alcohol Act 1989, Section 21(3)
Administrative Procedure Act, Section 24
Generato dall'IA
kho-precedent_2011_15
Supreme Administrative Court upheld environmental agency's revocation of waste permit due to systemic legal violations and environmental danger.
kho-precedent_1997_57
Application to revoke alcohol license dismissed because no new venue needed per health authority opinion.
kho-precedent_2004_1
Permanent license revocation upheld for allowing sex services in licensed alcohol venue despite future supervision concerns.
kho-other_2017_2495
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; noise nuisance claim rejected as obligation already fulfilled by structural measures.
admin_2022_vaasa__1158
Administrative court dismissed request to amend waste treatment plant permit based on Directive 2008/98/EC.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon tuotevalvontakeskus hylkäsi erotiikkaravintolan kaikkien alkoholijuomien anniskelulupaa koskevan hakemuksen sillä perusteella, ettei ravintola toiminta-ajatukseltaan täyttänyt alkoholilain 21 §:n 3 momentin mukaista asianmukaisuuden vaatimusta. KHO katsoi päätöksessään, että mainittu seikka on tarkoitussidonnaisuuden periaate huomioon ottaen anniskeluluvan epäämisen peruste ainoastaan silloin, kun tarkoituksena on alkoholin kulutusta ohjaamalla ehkäistä alkoholipitoisista aineista aiheutuvia lain 1 §:ssä lueteltuja haittoja. Tuotevalvontakeskuksen päätös kumottiin ja asia palautettiin uudelleen käsiteltäväksi.

AlkoholiL 1 §

AlkoholiL 21 §

HallintomenettelyL 24 §