KHO:1997:144
Generato dall'IA
Child protection appeal dismissed; court upheld social services' removal of child from parents' custody.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the decision to remove a child from parental custody. The social services argued that the parents failed to provide adequate care, while the parents contended they were capable of raising the child safely. The court ruled that the evidence supported the necessity of state intervention to protect the child's welfare.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IALastensuojelulaki 45 §; Sosiaalihuoltolaki 49 §: The court may order the removal of a child from parental custody when there are substantial grounds to believe that the child's well-being is at risk due to the parents' inability to provide adequate care.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
child protection removal
parental custody termination
social services authority
best interests of child
supreme administrative court
asilo familiare
rigore per motivi familiari
cambiamento di dimora
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IALastensuojelulaki 45 §
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 49 §
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IAD:3099/3/96
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAECLI:FI:KHO:2025:88
Supreme Administrative Court allows temporary home placement for child during custody despite lack of specific grounds.
admin_1986_aland-county__152
Child custody appeal dismissed because ending care would harm the child's established stability and best interests.
admin_2012_helsinki__953
Administrative court dismisses urgent placement and contact restriction claims under Child Protection Act.
admin_2012_hameenlinna__212
Administrative court dismissed foster care request because custody order is primary over removal under child protection law.
kko-other_2007_1792
Supreme Court allows supervised visitation for child's best interest despite father's objection to supervision.
Testo completo
Ks. myös D:3099/3/96
LastensuojeluL 45 §
SosiaalihuoltoL 49 §