Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1997:126 Generato dall'IA

Public procurement selection process dismissed for subjective reliance on past experience rather than objective technical differences.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1997:126
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the contractor's challenge to the kindergarten's procurement decision. The court found the selection process failed objectivity because the choice was based on the kindergarten's poor past experiences with the cheaper brand rather than significant technical differences. Consequently, the decision was invalid as it relied on subjective criteria instead of the required objective technical assessment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki julkisista hankinnoista 1 §; 7 §: The selection process in public procurement must be based on objective criteria and cannot rely on subjective past experiences when no significant technical differences exist between the offers.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
public procurement objective criteria subjective experience selection process technical differences administrative review Laki julkisista hankinnoista criteri di selezione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki julkisista hankinnoista 1 §
Laki julkisista hankinnoista 7 §
Generato dall'IA
market_2006_102
Market Court voids procurement decision due to unclear tender documents and unequal bidder treatment.
market_2005_89
Market court dismisses bid rejection due to contractor's failure to declare supplementary price and official's post-decision document alteration.
market_2010_542
Market Court dismisses bid protest where supplier excluded for missing liability insurance declared in tender.
market_2004_38
Market Court voids procurement decisions where tender documents fail to allow comparable bids and the authority ignores non-price criteria.
market_2020_460
Market Court dismisses appeal; ALTRA shoes cause confusion with ALTRA clothing trademarks despite different goods.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Lastenkodin johtaja oli tarjouskilpailun jälkeen hankkinut kaksi X-merkkistä televisiota. Halvemman, Y-merkkistä televisiota koskeneen tarjouksen tehnyt yrittäjä haki muutosta hankintapäätökseen. Lastenkodin johtaja ilmoitti valinnan perustuneen lastenkodin huonoihin kokemuksiin Y-merkkisistä televisioista sekä tarjottujen X-merkkisten televisioiden eräisiin parempiin teknisiin ominaisuuksiin, erityisesti tekstitv:n selailumuistin laajuuteen.

KHO totesi, ettei valintamenettely täyttänyt objektiivisuuden vaatimusta siltä osin kuin valintaa oli perusteltu lastenkodin huonoilla kokemuksilla Y-merkkisistä televisioista. Asiassa ei ollut myöskään osoitettu, että tarjotuilla televisiomalleilla olisi ollut olennaisia teknisiä eroavaisuuksia lukuunottamatta tekstitv:n selailumuistin laajuutta.

L julkisista hankinnoista 1 §

L julkisista hankinnoista 7 §