Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1997:113 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court rejects appeal against hunting permit denial on state land under Hunting Act provisions.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1997:113
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Rural Industry Appeal Board against the Forestry Administration's refusal of a hunting permit. The Forestry Administration denied the permit under Section 46 of the Hunting Act, asserting it was a state-owned area where hunting was prohibited. The court upheld the denial, ruling that the administrative body correctly applied the statutory restrictions on hunting on state lands.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Metsästyslain 46 §; Metsästyslain 44 §: The court established that hunting permits are denied on state-owned areas when the Hunting Act explicitly prohibits hunting there, and appeals against such denials must be directed to the Rural Industry Appeal Board.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
hunting permit denial state owned land Hunting Act provisions administrative appeal process forestry administration authority referendum chiesto dall'autorità stato richiesto misura pianificatoria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Metsästyslain 46 §
Metsähallituksen Oulun alueyksikkö oli hylännyt yksityisen henkilön metsästyslain 46 §:ssä tarkoitetun hakemuksen metsästysluvan saamisesta valtion alueelle.
Metsästyslain 44 §
Metsästyslain 6 §
Generato dall'IA
kho-other_2016_5438
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal on hunting license due to late cost reimbursement claim and upheld lower court decision.
kho-precedent_1997_10
Company dismissed as non-party in water area permit case lacking legal standing or ownership.
admin_1996_water-superior__83
Company appeal dismissed for lack of water right to object to forestry permit on marine area.
admin_2026_vaasa__133
Administrative court dismissed appeal against water law enforcement order for over 20 hectares of ditching.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:3
Court allows appeal against forestry ban, ruling Natura assessment required due to missing impact data.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Metsähallituksen Oulun alueyksikkö oli hylännyt yksityisen henkilön metsästyslain 46 §:ssä tarkoitetun hakemuksen metsästysluvan saamisesta valtion alueelle. Kysymyksessä oli Metsähallitukselle metsästyslain mukaan kuuluva viranomaistehtävä, jota koskevasta päätöksestä sai Metsähallituksesta annetun lain 4 §:n 2 momentin mukaan valittaa maaseutuelinkeinojen valituslautakunnalle. ()

Äänestys 4-4

L Metsähallituksesta 1 §

L Metsähallituksesta 2 § 3 mom

L Metsähallituksesta 2 § 5 mom

L Metsähallituksesta 4 § 2 mom

A Metsähallituksesta 5 § 2 kohta

MetsästysL 6 §

MetsästysL 44 §

MetsästysL 46 §