Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1997:106 Generato dall'IA

Court ruled that unsupervised work without agreed hours constitutes remuneration, not deductible advance payment.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1997:106
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the tax authority's claim that payments made to the contractor were deductible advance payments. The court found that the contractor worked without the client's supervision and without agreed working hours, which negated the conditions for advance payment status. Consequently, the payments were classified as remuneration subject to withholding tax, contrary to the tax authority's argument.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Ennakkoperintälaki 4 §; 6 §: When work is performed without the employer's supervision and without agreed working hours, the payment constitutes remuneration rather than deductible advance payment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
advance payment deduction remuneration classification unsupervised work working hours agreement withholding tax obligation contractor status tax authority claim lavoratore autonomo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Ennakkoperintälaki 4 §
Ennakkoperintälaki 6 §
Generato dall'IA
labour_1987_39
Labor court allows collective agreement clause permitting new construction electrical work as contract work without employer consent.
labour_2001_35
Labor court ruled a security guard on service fee was in an employment relationship entitled to vacation pay.
labour_2010_60
Labor court dismissed union claim that subcontractor violated collective agreement by using workers under its supervision.
labour_1982_119
Labor court dismissed union claim for compensation, ruling pipe replacement work must be paid as contract work.
labour_2004_6
Labour court dismissed union claim for breach of collective agreement regarding subcontractor work valuation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Metsuri A oli perustanut metsätyöpalveluyrityksen, jonka toimialana olivat metsänhoitotyöt ja turvetyöt. A oli merkitty ennakkoperintärekisteriin ja arvonlisäverovelvolliseksi. Hän huolehti omasta vakuutusturvastaan ja oli hankkinut alalla tarpeellisia työkaluja ja kalustoa. A oli tehnyt maanviljelijä X:n kanssa urakkasopimuksen metsän harvennuksesta ja ojalinjojen aukaisusta moottorisahaa käyttäen sekä puun teosta puutavaran määrään perustuvan urakkahinnan mukaan. Työajasta ja lomakorvauksesta ei ollut sovittu. A suoritti tehtävät ilman X:n työnjohtoa ja valvontaa. Noissa oloissa X:n A:lle suorittamia palkkiota ei pidetty työsuhteessa saatuna ennakkoperintälain 4 §:n tarkoittamana palkkana vaan saman lain 6 §:n tarkoittamana toiselle tehdystä työstä maksettuna korvauksena, josta ennakonpidätystä ei ole toimitettava, jos suorituksen saaja on merkitty ennakkoperintärekisteriin. Verovuosi_1996.

EnnakkoperintäL 4 §

EnnakkoperintäL 6 §