Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
HFD 26.1.2026/174 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal on planning scheme permit request due to lack of special grounds.

Numero d'incarto HFD 26.1.2026/174
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court rejected the appeal filed by a client and six companions regarding a planning scheme permit. The lower court had already resolved the matter, and the appellants failed to demonstrate a special reason for review under the Administrative Court Act. Consequently, the court found no grounds to grant a leave of appeal, resulting in the dismissal of the request.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Administrative Court Act 621/1999, s. 111; Leave of appeal is granted only if it is necessary for uniform application of law, due to obvious error, or for other weighty reasons, and was not granted here as no such grounds existed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
planning scheme permit leave of appeal Administrative Court Act uniform application of law special grounds for review gestione delle risorse obiettivo della pianificazione del territorio sviluppo sostenibile

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Administrative Court Act 621/1999, s. 111
Generato dall'IA
kho-other_2018_5241
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding planning authority for residents outside municipality boundaries.
kho-other_2017_3502
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses planning appeal due to procedural defects and lack of standing for listed individuals.
kho-other_2017_3815
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding quarrying permit where traffic safety concerns were deemed irrelevant to the permit decision.
admin_2017_aland__20
Administrative court dismissed appeal against detailed plan for industrial and storage areas in Åland.
kho-other_2018_2318
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against zoning plan denial of beach building site due to lack of equal treatment grounds.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Asia

Asemakaavaa koskeva valituslupahakemus

Muutoksenhakijat

A ja hänen kuusi asiakumppaniaan

Päätös, jota muutoksenhaku koskee

Pohjois-Suomen hallinto-oikeus 8.7.2025 nro 1004/2025

Korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaisu

Valituslupahakemus hylätään. Korkein hallinto-oikeus ei siten anna ratkaisua valitukseen.

Perustelut

Oikeudenkäynnistä hallintoasioissa annetun lain 111 §:n 1 momentin mukaan valituslupa on myönnettävä, jos:

1) lain soveltamisen kannalta muissa samanlaisissa tapauksissa tai oikeuskäytännön yhtenäisyyden vuoksi on tärkeätä saattaa asia korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi;

2) asian saattamiseen korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi on erityistä aihetta asiassa tapahtuneen ilmeisen virheen vuoksi; tai

3) valitusluvan myöntämiseen on muu painava syy.

Sen perusteella, mitä asiassa on esitetty ja mitä asiakirjoista muutoin ilmenee, asian saattamiseen korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi ei ole valitusluvan myöntämisen perustetta.

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Riitta Mutikainen, Eija Siitari ja Kari Tornikoski. Asian esittelijä Hanna-Maria Schiestl.