Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO 25.10.2019/5082 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal permission request for wind farm general plan decision due to lack of legal grounds.

Numero d'incarto KHO 25.10.2019/5082
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court rejected the applicants' request for permission to appeal the Regional Administrative Court's decision regarding the Palovaara wind farm general plan. The applicants argued for further review of the municipal council's approval, but the court found no sufficient legal basis to grant permission. Consequently, the appeal was not heard, and the original decision stands.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 188 § 1 momentti; Hallintolainkäyttölaki 13 § 2 momentti: Permission to appeal is granted only when the case requires a decision by the Supreme Administrative Court based on specific legal grounds, which were absent here.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
general plan approval wind farm project appeal permission municipal planning administrative review utilizzazione parsimoniosa del suolo luogo a utilizzazione sensibile uso comune

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 188 § 1 momentti
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 188 § 1 momentti
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 13 § 2 momentti
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 13 § 2 momentti
Generato dall'IA
kho-other_2015_1209
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeals against a coastal zone plan approval, rejecting oral hearing requests as unnecessary.
kho-other_2019_2295
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding planning permit due to lack of procedural error and insufficient evidence of bias.
kho-other_2025_2817
Supreme Court dismisses planning appeal against general plan while allowing company's appeal on costs.
kho-other_2020_2641
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding wind farm zoning plan due to insufficient bear impact assessment. The court upheld the zoning plan's validity despite concerns about bear populations. The decision emphasizes that planning must be based on data available at the time of approval. The court found no grounds to alter the lower court's ruling on the zoning plan. The appeal was rejected because the environmental assessment was deemed sufficient based on existing conditions. The court ruled that future bear population changes do not invalidate the plan. The decision clarifies the timing of environmental impact assessments in zoning procedures. The court determined the zoning plan complied with legal requirements for environmental review. The appeal failed because the lower court correctly applied the relevant zoning laws. The court concluded that the zoning plan remains legally valid and enforceable.
kho-other_2016_226
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against general plan approval due to lack of unreasonable harm despite lease rights.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Asia

Yleiskaavan hyväksymistä koskeva valituslupahakemus

Muutoksenhakijat

A, B, C, D, E, F ja G

Päätös, jota valituslupahakemus koskee

Pohjois-Suomen hallinto-oikeus 28.9.2018 nro 18/0192/1

Asian vaiheet

Pellon kunnanvaltuusto

on 3.10.2016 (§ 55) tekemällään päätöksellä hyväksynyt Palovaaran tuulivoimapuiston yleiskaavan.

Pohjois-Suomen hallinto-oikeus

on valituksenalaisella päätöksellään, siltä osin kuin asiasta on korkeimmassa hallinto-oikeudessa kysymys, osin jättänyt tutkimatta ja osin hylännyt muutoksenhakijoiden valituksen kunnanvaltuuston päätöksestä.

Muutoksenhakijat

ovat pyytäneet lupaa valittaa hallinto-oikeuden päätöksestä.

Korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaisu

Valituslupahakemus hylätään. Korkein hallinto-oikeus ei siten anna ratkaisua valitukseen.

Sen perusteella, mitä muutoksenhakijat ovat esittäneet ja mitä asiakirjoista muutoin ilmenee, asian saattamiseen korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ratkaistavaksi ei ole valitusluvan myöntämisen perustetta.

Sovelletut oikeusohjeet

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 188 § 1 momentti

Hallintolainkäyttölaki 13 § 2 momentti

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Hannu Ranta, Mika Seppälä ja Taina Pyysaari. Asian esittelijä Petri Hellstén.