Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VakO 17.2.2000/9077:98 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment benefits allowed for intermittent work by a self-employed employee of a family company.

Numero d'incarto VakO 17.2.2000/9077:98
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Unemployment Insurance Court modified the Unemployment Security Board's decision to grant unemployment benefits to a son working intermittently for his father's company. The applicant argued that as a self-employed employee, his work did not require continuous interruption for four months to qualify. The court ruled in favor of the applicant, establishing that such intermittent work patterns are permissible for self-employed employees seeking benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Security Act; Unemployment Insurance Act: Unemployment benefits may be granted to self-employed employees whose work is not continuously interrupted for four months.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
unemployment security self-employed employee intermittent work family company benefit eligibility residua capacità al guadagno contratto di lavoro a domicilio indennità giornaliera di transizione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Unemployment Security Act
Unemployment Insurance Act
Generato dall'IA
admin_1992_uusimaa-county__1241
Court dismissed unemployment benefit claim as income when recipient refused offered work.
insurance_2006_10193-2004
Court allows unemployment benefits by ruling that active job seeking outside the employment office is a valid reason for absence.
insurance_2001_1402-2000
Court allowed unemployment benefits by ruling seasonal business due to weather does not break continuous employment requirement.
insurance_2002_10516-2000
Court dismissed unemployment claim where part-time work averaged 18 hours weekly but failed periodical work requirements for smoothing periods.
insurance_2002_3335-2001
Court allows unemployment benefits when vocational training completion is voluntary and not a mandatory prerequisite for a final exam.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli kotona asuvan poikansa omistaman osakeyhtiön työntekijänä tehnyt yhdelle toimeksiantajalle, maaseutukeskukselle, ympäristönhoito-ohjelmia maaseutukeskuksen antamien osoitetietojen pohjalta. A haki työttömyyspäivärahaa työjaksojen välisiltä ajoilta. Koska kysymys oli palkansaajan rinnastettavasta yrittäjästä, päivärahan saaminen ei edellyttänyt, että toiminnan olisi tullut olla yhdenjaksoisesti keskeytyneenä neljän kuukauden ajan. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin.

Jaosto:V Äänestys: