Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
VakO 14.9.2000/8559:99 Generato dall'IA

Court ruled that an art student's part-time work as a painter did not disqualify them from unemployment benefits.

Numero d'incarto VakO 14.9.2000/8559:99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Insurance Court reversed the Unemployment Security Board's decision to deny benefits to an art student who had worked part-time as a painter. The Board argued that the student's employment history and artistic work constituted substantial activity, but the Court found the work to be incidental. Consequently, the court determined that the student remained eligible for unemployment support starting September 7, 1998.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Security Act; Part-time employment: Incidental work by a student does not constitute substantial activity and does not disqualify the individual from receiving unemployment security benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
unemployment security benefits part-time employment student status substantial activity incidental work insurance court ruling work history assessment prima formazione professionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Unemployment Security Act
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Katsottiin, että Vapaassa Taidekoulussa vuosina 19931997 opiskelleen ja päästötodistuksen huhtikuussa 1997 saaneen henkilön työhistoriasta ja taidemaalarin työstä saatu selvitys huomioon ottaen hänen työllistymisensä omassa työssään taidemaalarina on ollut sivutoimista eikä esteitä työmarkkinatuen maksamiselle tämän vuoksi 7.9.1998 alkaen ollut. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin.

Jaosto:V Äänestys: 3-2