Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VakO 3.5.2000/4750:99 Generato dall'IA

Study support denied for US resident without Finnish permanent residence; temporary stay not recognized.

Numero d'incarto VakO 3.5.2000/4750:99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim for study support, ruling that his residence in the USA since 1992 was not temporary. The applicant argued for support based on his studies abroad, but the court found no permanent residence in Finland. Consequently, the appeal committee's decision to deny support was upheld and the final appeal rejected.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

VakO 1 §; 1 §: Residence abroad must be temporary to qualify for study support; long-term absence without Finnish permanent residence precludes entitlement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
study support eligibility temporary residence requirement foreign study funding permanent residence status insurance court decision partenza dal paese diritto di soggiorno degli stranieri indennità di dislocazione e di espatrio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
VakO 1 §
Generato dall'IA
admin_2022_helsinki__2699
Family reunification residence permit denied when spouse no longer resides in Finland under the Act on the Status of Aliens.
admin_1999_helsinki__5048
Foreign national with Finnish residence lost citizenship due to temporary stay abroad not breaking continuity.
insurance_2015_5670-2013
Court allows student loan for abroad studies when foreign stay is temporary due to father's work.
insurance_2001_2990-2000
Court dismissed claim that intermittent foreign work breaks continuous residence for social security purposes.
insurance_2000_3771-1999
Study abroad stay deemed permanent; family history irrelevant; appeal dismissed for non-temporary residence.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli asunut isänsä työn vuoksi USA:ssa vuodesta 1992 lähtien eikä hänellä ollut ollut vakinaista kotikuntaa Suomessa tämän jälkeen. VakO katsoi, ettei A:n oleskelua ulkomailla voitu pitää tilapäisenä. A:lle ei näin ollen voitu myöntää opintotukea hänen USA:ssa harjoittamiaan opintoja varten. Opintotuen muutoksenhakulautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. Valitus hylättiin.

Jaosto:V Äänestys: