Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VakO 30.8.2000/3771:99 Generato dall'IA

Study abroad stay deemed permanent; family history irrelevant; appeal dismissed for non-temporary residence.

Numero d'incarto VakO 30.8.2000/3771:99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Insurance Court dismissed the appeal against the study support committee's decision to deny temporary residence status. The applicant had lived in Australia for five years before returning to Finland for university, arguing family history should influence the temporary stay assessment. The court ruled that family background is irrelevant and focused solely on the applicant's actual behavior and circumstances, finding the stay non-temporary.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Study Support Act; Temporary Residence Act: Family history carries no weight in assessing temporary residence; the court evaluates the applicant's actual conduct and circumstances to determine if a stay abroad is temporary.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
study support temporary residence family history non-temporary stay appeal dismissal residence status applicant conduct assenza prolungata all'estero

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Study Support Act
Temporary Residence Act
Generato dall'IA
insurance_2015_5670-2013
Court allows student loan for abroad studies when foreign stay is temporary due to father's work.
insurance_2004_8951-2002
Finland insurance court dismissed study aid claim due to lack of two-year Finnish domicile before studies.
admin_1999_helsinki__5048
Foreign national with Finnish residence lost citizenship due to temporary stay abroad not breaking continuity.
kho-precedent_1997_52
Foreign resident's permanent residence permit application dismissed due to lack of permanent stay in home country.
kho-precedent_2007_31
Citizenship denied to athlete spouse as continuous residence requirement not met despite marriage.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli muuttanut Australiaan vuonna 1993 ja opiskellut siellä viisi vuotta ennen yliopisto-opiskeluaan Suomessa. VakO katsoi, että arvioitaessa sitä, onko henkilön oleskelu ulkomailla opintotukilaissa tarkoitetulla tavalla tilapäistä, ei A:n esittämälle selvitykselle sukunsa historiasta voida antaa juurikaan painoa, vaan tarkastelun kohteena on opintotuen hakijan oma käyttäytyminen ja olosuhteet. A:n oleskelua ulkomailla ei voitu pitää tilapäisenä oleskeluna. Opintotuen muutoksenhakulautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. Valitus hylättiin.

Jaosto:VI Äänestys: