Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VakO 15.2.2000/10042:98 Generato dall'IA

Insurance court awards compensation for nerve damage caused by a diagnostic procedure following a work injury.

Numero d'incarto VakO 15.2.2000/10042:98
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Insurance Court overturned the Accident Board's decision to deny compensation for nerve damage sustained after a diagnostic scan. The insured suffered a work-related injury in late 1996, underwent a diagnostic scan in July 1997, and subsequently developed paralysis of the peroneal nerve. The court determined that the paralysis was a complication of the diagnostic procedure rather than the original injury, thereby ordering compensation under the relevant insurance regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

TVL 14 § 4 momentti; TVL 15 §: If a medical examination or treatment performed in connection with a work injury causes new damage, such damage is compensable as a complication of the injury.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
work injury compensation diagnostic procedure complication peroneal nerve paralysis insurance liability medical examination damage rivalutazione medica peggioramento notevole della salute affezione nell'assicurazione militare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
TVL 14 § 4 momentti
TVL 15 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2012_2102
Supreme Court dismisses claim that CRPS syndrome is causally linked to a 2003 accident and subsequent surgeries.
kko-other_1998_570
Workplace injury claim dismissed as employee failed to prove causal link between lifting and injury.
insurance_1990_1630-1988
Insurance court dismissed claim for compensation from peacekeeping personnel regarding accident fund decision.
kko-other_1995_4910
Supreme Court dismisses claim for Sudeck atrophy compensation as it is not a recognized medical condition for disability benefits.
insurance_1979_1652-1979
Insurance court dismissed claim for aggravated degenerative disease damages where pre-existing condition was not caused by accident.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

X:n 21.11.1996 saamasta vasemman polven venähdyksestä johtuva työkyvyn alentuma oli katsottu alle 10 %:ksi 15.12.1996 jälkeen. X:lle oli 8.7.1997 tehty vasemman polven diagnostinen tähystys ja Maatalousyrittäjien eläkelaitos oli korvannut tästä toimenpiteestä aiheutuneet kustannukset TVL:n 14 §:n 4 momentissa tarkoitettuna tutkimuskuluna. Tähystyksen jälkeen X:n vasemman jalkaterän toiminnallinen tila on ollut huono ja hänellä on todettu pohjehermon halvaus. Esitetyn lääketieteellisen selvityksen perusteella vakuutusoikeus on pitänyt todennäköisenä, että X:llä todettu pohjehermon halvaus on seurausta 8.7.1997 tehdyn leikkauksen puudutustoimenpiteestä ja näin ollen vaurio on korvattava TVL:n nojalla X:lle 21.11.1996 sattuneen tapaturman seurauksena. Tapaturmalautakunnan päätös on kumottu ja X:lle on määrätty suoritettavaksi lainmukainen korvaus hänelle 8.7.1997 tehdystä vasemman polven tähystyksestä komplikaationa aiheutuneesta pohjehermon halvauksesta.

Jaosto:IV Äänestys: 4 1