Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VakO 8.12.1998/9686:97 Generato dall'IA

Insurance court denies liability for intentional shooting by third party under TVL 4 § 1 as it is not a traffic accident.

Numero d'incarto VakO 8.12.1998/9686:97
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The insurance court dismissed the claimant's request for compensation under the Traffic Liability Act after the Traffic Accident Board rejected it. The claimant, a truck driver, was shot by a third party who had previously argued with him and then purchased a gun to kill him on the same day. The court ruled that the intentional killing by a third party does not constitute a traffic accident under the specific provisions of the Traffic Liability Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

TVL 4 § 1 momentti; intentional killing by a third party is not a traffic accident under the Traffic Liability Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Traffic Liability Act intentional killing third party liability traffic accident definition insurance compensation claim dismissal personal violence perdita di lavoro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
TVL 4 § 1 momentti
Generato dall'IA
labour_1984_137
Labor court orders unions to pay fines for violating collective agreement peace clauses and neglecting supervision duties.
kko-other_2003_463
Supreme Court dismissed claim for damages for occupational disease when same injury could be claimed as work-related illness.
labour_2012_141
Labor court dismisses dismissal claim due to lack of serious misconduct but awards damages and fines.
kko-precedent_2017_16
Supreme Court rules employer must follow union representative dismissal protection despite procedural election errors.
kko-precedent_1995_143
Supreme Court of Finland rules on conditional vs. mandatory prison terms for attempted murder and endangerment.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Vakuutettu A työskenteli lossinkuljettajana. Hän oli työssään joutunut vuosien aikana useamman kerran huomauttamaan lossilla matkustanutta B:tä asiattomasta lossikäyttäytymisestä, mistä oli aiheutunut eripuraa heidän välilleen. Erään muusta syystä A:n kanssa sattuneen erimielisyyden jälkeen B oli myöhemmin samana päivänä hankkinut aseen ja ajattanut itsensä lossille, jossa hän oli tiennyt A:n olevan ja ampunut A:ta seurauksin, että A oli vahingoittunut. Tämän katsottiin sattuneen TVL 4 §:n 1 momentin 1-3 kohdassa tarkoitetuissa olosuhteissa ja A:lla oli siten oikeus TVL:n mukaiseen korvaukseen. Tapaturmalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu.

Jaosto:VI Äänestys: 4-1