Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VakO 3.12.1998/8725:97 Generato dall'IA

Insurance court denied unemployment benefits when employer bonus was prorated to cover the employment termination period.

Numero d'incarto VakO 3.12.1998/8725:97
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Insurance Court dismissed the claim for unemployment benefits covering the period from December 1, 1995, to January 4, 1996. The applicant received a termination bonus of 20,000 marks, which the employer argued was a one-time incentive rather than regular income, and the court prorated this amount to the specific end-of-year period. Consequently, the court ruled that the bonus constituted an economic advantage received from the employer, thereby excluding the applicant from receiving unemployment benefits for that duration.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Act; Social Insurance Act: When a termination bonus is prorated to cover the period of employment termination, the recipient is deemed to have received an economic advantage from the employer and is therefore ineligible for unemployment benefits during that prorated period.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
termination bonus unemployment benefits economic advantage proration of income Social Insurance Act employment termination income exclusion sospensione delle prestazioni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Unemployment Act
Social Insurance Act

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
D:4046:98
Generato dall'IA
labour_1984_136
Labor court allows severance pay when employer terminates sick employee after permanent disability pension granted.
insurance_2006_10193-2004
Court allows unemployment benefits by ruling that active job seeking outside the employment office is a valid reason for absence.
insurance_1990_410-1990
Part-time teacher denied unemployment benefits for period after contract ended due to lack of layoff.
labour_2010_56
Labor court dismissed union claim that sick pay applies to recurrent illness if first episode lacked pay due to short tenure.
insurance_1998_290-1998
Unemployment benefit denied due to six-month absence without valid reason and failure to meet work requirement.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

X:n työsuhde oli päättynyt 30.11.1995. Työsuhteen päättymisen yhteydessä X:lle maksettu kannustuspalkkio 20.000 markkaa ajalta 1.7.-30.11.1995 on jaksotettu vakiintuneena pidettävän palkan perusteella ajalle 1.12.1995-4.1.1996. Työnantajan mukaan kannustuspalkkio ei ollut X:n vakiintunutta ansiota ja palkkio perustui siihen, että X:n työsuhde oli päättymässä ja työnantaja halusi motivoida irtisanottavat henkilöt tekemään työtä. VakO katsoi, että kannustuspalkkion maksaminen johtui työsuhteen päättymisestä eikä X:llä ollut oikeutta työttömyyspäivärahaan siltä ajalta, jolle työnantajalta saatu taloudellinen etuus voidaan jaksottaa. X:n saama kannustuspalkkio ei kuulunut hänen vakiintuneena pidettävään palkkatuloonsa. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. Vrt. D:4046:98

Jaosto:V Äänestys: