Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VakO 5.11.1998/4545:98 Generato dall'IA

Insurance court dismissed claim for insulin cooler as work disability aid under Finnish Insurance Act.

Numero d'incarto VakO 5.11.1998/4545:98
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Finnish Insurance Court dismissed the truck driver's request to replace a truck refrigerator with disability care funds. The court determined the device did not meet the legal definition of a work disability aid because it did not improve or preserve the applicant's work capacity. Consequently, the court ruled that the cooler provided no benefit for the applicant's ability to perform work tasks.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Insurance Act 1993, s. 10; Disability Care Act 1982, s. 1: A device is only compensable as a work disability aid if it is necessary to improve or preserve work capacity and provides a direct benefit for performing work tasks.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
work disability aid insurance compensation diabetes equipment work capacity preservation Finnish Insurance Act medical necessity truck driver benefits inesigibile malgrado lesioni salute

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Insurance Act 1993, s. 10
Disability Care Act 1982, s. 1
Generato dall'IA
insurance_2002_4049-1999
Insurance Court quashed decision for violating EU Regulation 574/72 procedural rules on cross-border pension appeals.
labour_1973_18
Labor unions fined for insufficient strike prevention measures violating collective agreement peace clauses.
kko-precedent_2010_14
Supreme Court reversed lower court dismissal, holding unauthorized eye exams for glasses constitute practicing medicine without license.
kko-precedent_2005_34
Supreme Court dismisses judge's dismissal appeal, finding permanent loss of work capacity due to illness.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:125
Supreme Administrative Court refers to CJEU whether three-year supervised doctor registration violates EU freedom of establishment.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A, joka oli ammatiltaan autonkuljettaja ja sairasti diabetesta, oli vaatinut kuorma-autoon hankittavan jääkaapin korvaamista sairaudenhoitoon liittyvänä apuvälineenä. VakO katsoi, ettei kuorma-autoon sijoitettavan jääkaapin hankintaa voitu tukea kuntoutusvaroin, koska kysymyksessä ei ollut lain tarkoittama apuväline, joka on tarpeen työkyvyn ja ansiomahdollisuuksien parantamiseksi tai säilyttämiseksi siten, että jääkaapista olisi valittajalle hyötyä työstä suoriutumiselle. VakO hylkäsi valituksen.

Jaosto:II Äänestys: