Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VakO 17.3.1998/3849:97 Generato dall'IA

Temporary work without payment does not constitute a TVL contract; meal allowance alone is insufficient compensation.

Numero d'incarto VakO 17.3.1998/3849:97
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Insurance Court dismissed the claimant's request for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act because no valid employment relationship existed. Although the employer provided only a meal allowance for temporary work lasting a few days, the court found this insufficient to establish the economic consideration required by the Act. Consequently, the accident was not deemed to occur during a covered employment relationship, and the decision was remitted to the insurer.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

TVL 1 § 1 momentti; TVL 1 § 2 momentti: A temporary task performed without remuneration, where the only benefit provided is a meal allowance, does not constitute the economic consideration required to establish an employment relationship under the Workmen's Compensation Act, and thus an accident occurring during such a task is not covered.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Workmen's Compensation Act temporary employment relationship economic consideration requirement meal allowance insufficiency remission to insurer lavoro non remunerato violazione di obbligazioni contrattuali di lavoro rapporto di lavoro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
TVL 1 § 1 momentti
TVL 1 § 2 momentti
Generato dall'IA
insurance_1979_8997-1978
Court held that an incidental family member assisting in forestry work was covered by work accident insurance.
insurance_1976_9208-1975
Insurance court denies work injury claim when employee lacks statutory insurance coverage at time of accident.
kko-precedent_1999_55
Supreme Court dismisses claim that spouse was employer's employee under accident insurance law due to lack of contract and consent.
kko-precedent_2000_93
Supreme Court holds injury during free time after event program ended is not a work accident under Act 4 § 1.
insurance_2001_9920-2000
Workplace injury during employer-organized activity counts as work-related injury for insurance coverage.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

X oli ollut Y:n omistaman sikalan korjaustyössä ja tässä työssä vahingoittunut. Y:n ilmoituksen mukaan työsuhde oli ollut tilapäinen ja tarkoitus oli ollut tehdä työ valmiiksi muutamassa päivässä. Y:n mukaan palkkaa ei ollut maksettu, mutta X oli saanut syödäkseen. VakO katsoi, ettei pelkällä ateriaedulla ole sellaista taloudellista arvoa, jota voitaisiin pitää TVL:n 1 §:n 1 momentissa tarkoitettuna vastikkeena X:n suorittamasta työstä. Asiassa ei ollut esitetty selvitystä muunkaan vastikkeen suorittamisesta. X:n ei katsottu olleen tapaturman sattuessa ko. lainkohdan tarkoittamassa työsuhteessa. Tapaturmalautakunnan päätös kumottiin ja asia jätettiin vakuutusyhtiön antaman päätöksen varaan.

Jaosto:II Äänestys: 4-1