Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
VakO 29.10.1998/2971:98 Generato dall'IA

Insurance court denied work loss compensation for assault victim whose business had no income due to closure.

Numero d'incarto VakO 29.10.1998/2971:98
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Insurance Court dismissed the claim for work loss compensation against the State Office for the Compensation of Crime Victims. The plaintiff, a hairdresser, was on sick leave following a serious assault, and the State Office had paid sick pay. However, the court found the business had no income during the period because it was closed due to the assault, ruling that no work loss occurred. Consequently, the claim was rejected as the statutory requirement for income loss was not met.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Rikosvahinkolain 1 luku 1 §; 1 luku 2 §: When a victim's business is closed due to a crime, the lack of income during the closure period precludes a finding of work loss compensation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
work loss compensation crime victim business closure no income period Rikosvahinkolaki motivi medici finanziamento dell'assicurazione malattie affezione nell'assicurazione militare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Rikosvahinkolain 1 luku 1 §
Rikosvahinkolain 1 luku 2 §
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kampaaja X, joka toimi itsenäisenä yrittäjänä, joutui törkeän pahoinpitelyn seurauksena jäämään sairauslomalle. Kansaneläkelaitos oli maksanut sairausloma-ajalta X:lle sairauspäivärahaa. Kirjanpitäjän todistuksen mukaan yrityksellä ei ollut ollut kyseisenä aikana tuloja sairausloman johdosta. Koska kampaamoalan yritys oli ollut suljettu sairausloman takia, vakuutusoikeus katsoi X:lle aiheutuneen rikosvahinkolain nojalla korvaukseen oikeuttavaa työansion menetystä kysymyksessä olevan rikoksen johdosta. Valtiokonttorin päätös kumottiin.

Jaosto:IV Äänestys: