Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VakO 4.11.1997/425:97 Generato dall'IA

Insurance court ruled a probationary work accident occurred during the probation period despite initial doubts about employment status.

Numero d'incarto VakO 4.11.1997/425:97
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The insurance court upheld the accident board's decision that the accident happened during a probationary employment period. Although the defendant argued the plaintiff was merely a driving student, the court found the probation period constituted a work relationship under the relevant insurance act. Consequently, the court determined the accident fell within the scope of coverage for work-related incidents.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

TVL 1 §; The period of probation constitutes a work relationship for the purposes of the liability insurance act, thereby covering accidents occurring during this time.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
probationary employment work relationship definition liability insurance coverage accident board decision insurance court ruling perdita di lavoro temporanea status occupazionale rapporto di lavoro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
TVL 1 §
Kun koeaika kuului työsuhteeseen, tapaturma oli sattunut TVL 1 §:n tarkoittamassa työsuhteessa.
Generato dall'IA
insurance_2002_447-2001
Work accident coverage granted when employee participated in employer-approved sports competition during work hours.
labour_2014_107
Labour Court dismissed PALTA's appeal against Veturimiesten Liitto's decision regarding collective bargaining agreement interpretation.
insurance_1978_10987-1976
Employee injured by employer-installed safety equipment during work hours is entitled to work injury compensation.
labour_1986_123
Labor court dismisses union appeal when employee's prolonged incapacity constitutes valid dismissal reason under collective agreement.
labour_2007_11
Labor court orders employer to pay severance but dismisses union's claim against employer association.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A:n katsottiin olleen tapaturman sattuessa Oy:ssä työssä koeajalla, vaikka hän Oy:n mukaan oli ollut ainoastaan ajo-oppilaana ja tutustumassa paikkoihin

ja tarkoitus oli sopia tarkemmin työstä myöhemmin. Kun koeaika kuului työsuhteeseen, tapaturma oli sattunut TVL 1 §:n tarkoittamassa työsuhteessa. Tapaturmalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. V-jaosto