Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VakO 15.10.1985/391:85 Generato dall'IA

Insurance court allows remote door lock installation for a paralyzed man as invalidity care vehicle equipment.

Numero d'incarto VakO 15.10.1985/391:85
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Insurance Court ordered the installation of remote-controlled door lock systems in the applicant's vehicle as part of his invalidity care. The 25-year-old male suffered spinal cord injuries and paralysis in his lower limbs following a traffic accident. The court ruled that these devices were necessary to enable the applicant to safely operate his vehicle independently.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Insurance Act; Invalidity Care Act: The court established that installing remote-controlled door locks constitutes valid invalidity care equipment when a traffic accident victim suffers paralysis preventing independent vehicle operation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
invalidity care equipment remote door control traffic accident injury vehicle accessibility spinal cord paralysis insurance court ruling independent vehicle use consegna dei mezzi ausiliari

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Insurance Act
Invalidity Care Act
Generato dall'IA
insurance_1985_1245-1985
Insurance court denied invalidity care phone for car use due to lack of medical necessity.
insurance_2009_3334-2009
Insurance court dismissed ski lift chair as non-essential rehabilitation aid for partial spinal cord injury patient.
insurance_1982_6514-1981
Insurance court rules phone purchase necessary for blind person's mobility and orders coverage.
insurance_2006_8319-2005
Insurance court lacks jurisdiction to assess causation between injury and accident under specific disability compensation law.
insurance_1984_80-1984
Insurance court allowed costs for a mobile phone as necessary rehabilitation treatment to maintain work capacity.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Liikenneonnettomuudessa selkäytimen vioittuman ja sen seurauksena mm. alaraajojen halvaantumisen saaneelle 25-vuotiaalle mieshenkilölle määrättiin henkilöauton käyttämiseksi invalidihuoltona kustannettavaksi autotallin oven kauko-ohjauslaitteet. II -jaosto