Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
AUTO 355/1996 ECLI:ES:TC:1996:355A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to formally invoke the right claimed in the petition.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 355/1996
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible because the petitioner failed to formally invoke the specific right they claimed was violated. The applicant, representing a dispute over military pay, did not explicitly identify the constitutional provision infringed upon in the initial petition. Consequently, the court ruled that without this formal invocation, the substantive constitutional content of the demand could not be examined.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 44.1 CE: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal if the petitioner fails to formally invoke the specific right alleged to be violated, as this requirement is a prerequisite for admissibility.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
formal invocation requirement constitutional appeal admissibility failure to specify right procedural defect in petition constitutional content of demand

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 CE
Art. 44.1 CE

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1451-1996

Fecha de resolución

09/12/1996

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.451/1996.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Francisco Caravaca Cuenca contra Auto del Juzgado de lo Social núm. 2 de Murcia que confirma providencia anterior que ordenó el archivo de la demanda contra el Ministerio de Defensa, sobre cantidad.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1996/1996_00355-1996_01451.pdf