Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
AUTO 241/1995 ECLI:ES:TC:1995:241A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection and failure to compare equal situations.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 241/1995
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the lower court's dismissal of proceedings violated the effective judicial protection of judges and tribunals. The applicants argued for equality in legal treatment, but the Court found no comparable situation to evaluate. Consequently, the decision was rejected because the constitutional content of the demand was lacking and the resolution was unmotivated.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 CE; Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1995: The right to effective judicial protection requires that resolutions be motivated and that equal situations be compared; a lack of motivation or failure to establish a comparable situation renders the appeal inadmissible.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection motivation of resolution principle of equality constitutional content of demand inadmissibility of appeal judges and tribunals lack of comparable situation

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 CE
Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1995

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 661-1995

Fecha de resolución

11/09/1995

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 661/1995.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la resolución recurrida. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Margarita Núñez Palomar y otros contra Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Segovia recaído en apelación contra el dictado por el Juzgado de Instrucción de Cuéllar que archiva diligencias previas seguidas por presunto delito de imprudencia.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00241-1995_00661.pdf