Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 91/1995 ECLI:ES:TC:1995:91A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to lack of demand content and no violation of presumption of innocence.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 91/1995
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible for lack of procedural content and failure to demonstrate a violation of the presumption of innocence. The applicant challenged a Supreme Court ruling regarding a death caused by negligence, arguing that the trial was unduly delayed and that his right to a fair process was breached. The court rejected these claims because the demand lacked necessary substantive elements and the record showed no actual infringement of constitutional rights.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 24.2 CE: The right to a fair trial and presumption of innocence are not violated when the procedural record demonstrates no undue delay and the applicant fails to substantiate specific constitutional infringements in the demand.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
presumption of innocence fair trial rights procedural delay lack of demand content constitutional appeal inadmissibility

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 CE
Art. 24.2 CE

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2400-1994

Fecha de resolución

09/03/1995

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.400/1994.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Derecho a un proceso sin dilaciones: no vulnerado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Julián Olabarría Lazcano contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo recaída en recurso de casación contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Bilbao en sumario sobre falta de lesiones en concurso ideal con un delito de imprudencia

temeraria con resultado de muerte.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00091-1994_02400.pdf