Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
AUTO 312/1993 ECLI:ES:TC:1993:312A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to applicant's own fault and lack of constitutional content in the underlying claim.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 312/1993
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by 'Cooperativa Laboral Nuevo Horizonte' against a first-instance court's refusal to admit a reposición request. The applicant argued the lower court's decision violated constitutional rights, but the Court found the underlying urban lease claim lacked constitutional content. Consequently, the Court ruled the appeal was inadmissible because the failure to properly frame the constitutional issue was attributable to the applicant.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 CE; Art. 54 CE: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the underlying claim lacks constitutional content and the procedural defect is attributable to the applicant.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
constitutional appeal inadmissibility lack of constitutional content procedural fault attributable urban lease law dispute recurso de amparo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 CE
Art. 54 CE

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don José Gabaldón López y don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 754-1993

Fecha de resolución

25/10/1993

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 754/1993

Resumen

Inadmisión. Desistimiento: improcedencia. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Cooperativa Laboral Nuevo Horizonte» contra providencia del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 20 de Madrid, que inadmite recurso de reposición en ejecución de Sentencia recaída en autos incidentales de la Ley de Arrendamientos Urbanos.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1993/1993_00312-1993_00754.pdf