Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration of the action under Article 24 of the Constitution.
Spagna (ES)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedural deadline for filing the action had expired. The applicant challenged a Supreme Court ruling on an insult charge, arguing a violation of constitutional rights, but failed to submit the request within the statutory period. The court rejected the claim solely on this procedural ground, emphasizing that the substantive merits were never examined due to the lapse of time.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 24 CE; Art. 44.1 CE: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine the merits of an appeal if the action has expired due to the lapse of the prescribed time limits.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 770-1991
Fecha de resolución
15/07/1991
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 770/1991
Resumen
Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.
Don Daniel Callejones Prieto contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo que declara no haber lugar al recurso de casación contra la dictada por el Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cantabria, sobre delito de injurias.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1991/1991_00221-1991_00770.pdf