Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 254/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:254A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to lack of legal merit in the underlying social dismissal case.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 254/1990
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Juan Cárceles Nieto against the denial of a social appeal. The applicant argued that the lower court's refusal violated his right to effective judicial protection under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this claim because the underlying social dismissal proceedings lacked the necessary legal merit to warrant constitutional intervention.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.; The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine the merits of a social dismissal case when the lower court has already denied the appeal for lack of legal merit, thereby exhausting ordinary judicial remedies.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection social dismissal proceedings lack of legal merit exhaustion of remedies Constitutional Court jurisdiction appeal for protection of rights Article 24 Constitution

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
despido. Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
despido. Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2204-1989

Fecha de resolución

18/06/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.204/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso de suplicación; cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Juan Cárceles Nieto y otros contra Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Murcia, que deniega la admisión a trámite del recurso de suplicación contra la dictada por el Juzgado de los Social núm. 4 de dicha ciudad, en procedimiento sobre

despido. Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00254-1989_02204.pdf