Constitutional Court dismisses amparo for lack of proven right violation in urban lease appeal rejection.
Spagna (ES)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the amparo resource filed by Don Francisco Martín Pintado García against the District Court of Madrid's refusal to admit an appeal in a urban lease case. The applicant invoked Article 24.1 of the Constitution, claiming a violation of his right to effective judicial protection, but failed to substantiate the specific right that was allegedly infringed. Consequently, the court rejected the request for suspension and the amparo itself due to the lack of proven material facts establishing a constitutional violation.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 54.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an amparo resource inadmissible when the applicant fails to demonstrate the existence of a specific right that has been violated by the contested resolution.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1334-1989
Fecha de resolución
15/01/1990
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.334/1989
Resumen
Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: no acreditada.
Don Francisco Martín Pintado García contra Resoluciones del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 5 de Madrid que inadmiten recurso de apelación contra sentencia en autos sobre arrendamientos urbanos, art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00011-1989_01334.pdf