Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 306/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:306A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to applicant's failure to prove effective judicial protection. The court rejects the claim for effective judicial protection. The court finds the applicant failed to demonstrate effective judicial protection. The court dismisses the appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection. The court rejects the appeal because the applicant failed to prove effective judicial protection.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 306/1989
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible for lack of procedural standing. The applicant, a dismissed employee, challenged a Supreme Court labor judgment claiming a violation of Article 24.1 of the Constitution regarding effective judicial protection. The court ruled that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the lower courts' decisions were arbitrary or that no effective remedy existed, thus rejecting the constitutional complaint.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The Constitutional Court holds that an appeal for constitutional protection is inadmissible when the applicant fails to prove that the judicial process was arbitrary or that no effective remedy was available.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection constitutional appeal inadmissibility labor dismissal case procedural standing requirement Article 24.1 Constitution

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2075-1989

Fecha de resolución

05/06/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.075/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso de casación laboral. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña M.ª del Mar Roldán Moyano interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo en recurso de casación contra la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 10 de Madrid, en autos sobre despido. Invoca la vulneración

del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers