Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 1254/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1254A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of comparison terms and insufficient judicial motivation.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 1254/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Doña Inés Cano Sánchez and others against a labor court judgment regarding salary increases. The applicants argued violations of equality and effective judicial protection rights under the Constitution, but the court found no valid comparison terms for the equality claim and noted the lower court's failure to adequately motivate its decision. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the fundamental requirements for admissibility were not met.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Arts. 14, 9.2, 24 y 28 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the equality claim lacks necessary comparison terms and the lower court's judgment suffers from insufficient motivation, thereby failing to provide effective judicial protection.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Constitutional appeal inadmissibility Principle of equality comparison terms Effective judicial protection motivation Labor court judgment review Constitutional rights violation claim

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 14 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 9.2, 24 y 28 C.E.
Art. 9.2 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 28 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 789-1988

Fecha de resolución

21/11/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 789/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Inés Cano Sánchez y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo en suplicación de la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 20 de Madrid, en autos sobre reclamación sobre aumentos retributivos. Invocan la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 9.2, 24 y 28 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01254-1988_00789.pdf