Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 1114/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1114A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court dismisses appeal against conviction for negligence due to lack of procedural demand content.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 1114/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Valcárcel Rodríguez against his conviction for negligence. The applicant argued that the lower court violated his right to a fair trial under Article 24.2 of the Constitution, but the court found the appeal lacked the necessary substantive content required for admissibility. Consequently, the request for suspension of the conviction's execution was rejected without examining the merits of the alleged rights violation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.2 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires a substantive demand in amparo appeals, and the absence of such content renders the resource inadmissible regardless of the alleged procedural defects.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
constitutional appeal admissibility procedural demand content right to fair trial negligence conviction suspension of execution

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.2 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 201-1988

Fecha de resolución

10/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 201/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: valoración de la prueba. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Ramón Valcárcel Rodríguez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción de Aranjuez que en apelación revoca la del Juzgado de Distrito y condena por falta de imprudencia del art. 586.3.º del Código Penal. Invoca la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el artículo 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers