Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 1055/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1055A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to unproven notification date and lack of constitutional content.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 1055/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to prove the date of notification for the labor court judgment. The applicants argued that the proceedings violated their right to a court under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found the claim lacked sufficient constitutional substance. Consequently, the procedural defect regarding notification timing and the absence of a clear constitutional violation led to the rejection of the remedy.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal when the applicant fails to substantiate the date of notification and the claim lacks specific constitutional content.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Constitutional Appeal Right to Court Notification Date Procedural Defect Labor Dispute Substantive Merits Inadmissibility

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 259-1988

Fecha de resolución

26/09/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 259/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña María Teresa Martín de Benito y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo de Cáceres y Auto de aclaración, en procedimiento sobre reclamación de elecciones de representantes del personal. Invocan la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01055-1988_00259.pdf