Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 977/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:977A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of ordinary court jurisdiction and sentence motivation.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 977/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to a lack of ordinary court jurisdiction and insufficient motivation in the lower court's decision. Vigilsa, S.A. argued that Articles 9, 14, 17, and 24.1 of the Constitution were violated regarding effective judicial protection and the right to a judge. The Court rejected these claims because the disputed issue fell under the exclusive competence of the ordinary judiciary and the lower court provided adequate reasoning.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 17 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction over matters exclusively within the competence of the ordinary judiciary, and an appeal for protection of rights is inadmissible if the contested decision is not subject to ordinary appellate review or lacks sufficient motivation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ordinary court jurisdiction effective judicial protection sentence motivation constitutional appeal inadmissibility competence of ordinary courts

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 17 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 912-1988

Fecha de resolución

21/07/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 912/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia recurrida. Derecho al Juez ordinario: cuestión de competencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Vigilsa, Sociedad Anónima», interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Granada en apelación respecto de la dictada por el Juzgado de Distrito núm. 7, en autos sobre reclamación de cantidad. Invoca la vulneración de los

derechos consagrados en los arts. 9, 14, 17 y 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00977-1988_00912.pdf