Constitutional court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to lack of content in the underlying labor judgment.
Spagna (ES)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Doña Carmen Pereda Mendoza against a labor court dismissal judgment. The applicant invoked Article 24 of the Constitution, arguing for effective judicial protection, but the Court found the underlying sentence lacked the necessary legal content to support such a claim. Consequently, the court ruled that the procedural defect lay in the initial judgment's failure to substantiate its reasoning, rendering the constitutional remedy inapplicable.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 24 C.E.; The Constitutional Court holds that an appeal for protection of rights is inadmissible when the underlying judgment lacks the requisite legal content and reasoning to constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 528-1988
Fecha de resolución
06/06/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 528/1988
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: declaración de incompetencia; fundamentación de la Sentencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Doña Carmen Pereda Mendoza interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo en suplicación de la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 13 de Madrid, en autos sobre despido. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos
consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers