Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 707/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:707A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to non-exhaustion of judicial remedies under Article 24 CE.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 707/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust judicial remedies. Don Ramón Tatay Tatay challenged a civil court decision regarding a property dispute under the 1978 Law, invoking Articles 9, 14, 17.1, and 24 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that since no effective judicial review was available or pursued, the constitutional rights were not properly exhausted before this body.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The right to judicial protection is not absolute and requires the exhaustion of ordinary legal remedies; an appeal to the Constitutional Court is inadmissible if the applicant has not first sought redress in the ordinary courts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
exhaustion of remedies ordinary judicial review constitutional appeal inadmissibility Article 24 CE property dispute procedure

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 9 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 9, 14, 17.1 y 24 C.E.
Art. 14 C.E.
Art. 17.1 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 51-1988

Fecha de resolución

06/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 51/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Agotamiento de recursos en la vía judicial: inexistencia.

Don Ramón Tatay Tatay interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Primera de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial de Valencia y Auto de aclaración, en apelación de la dictada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 3 en procedimiento

incidental de la Ley 62/1978. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 9, 14, 17.1 y 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00707-1988_00051.pdf