Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
AUTO 600/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:600A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to procedural expiration and failure to formally invoke the right.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 600/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedural deadline for filing had expired and the applicant failed to formally invoke the specific constitutional right violated. The petitioner sought a public defender to challenge a labor dismissal judgment but did not meet the strict temporal requirements or articulate the constitutional grievance with necessary precision. Consequently, the court rejected the request, emphasizing that procedural bars and formal invocation deficiencies preclude constitutional review.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 CE; Art. 44 CE: The constitutional appeal is inadmissible if the action has expired due to the lapse of the prescribed time limit or if the applicant fails to formally and specifically invoke the constitutional right alleged to be violated.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedural expiration constitutional appeal formal invocation time limit lapse public defender appointment

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 CE
Art. 44 CE

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1089-1987

Fecha de resolución

23/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.089/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña María del Carmen Fontecha e Higes solicita el nombramiento de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo frente a la Sentencia de la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo confirmatoria de la de la Magistratura de

Trabajo núm. 5 de Madrid en autos sobre despido.

containers

Visualización

containers