Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of congruence and failure to substantiate Article 24.1 CE violation.
Spagna (ES)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights (recurso de amparo) filed by Pedro Luis Ferrero Rodríguez against a criminal conviction for disobedience. The petitioner argued that the lower court's judgment violated his right to a reasoned decision under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found no congruence between the complaint and the alleged defect. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the claim did not substantiate a specific constitutional violation regarding the motivation of the sentence.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal for protection of rights if the complaint lacks congruence with the alleged violation or fails to substantiate the constitutional defect claimed.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 414-1988
Fecha de resolución
25/04/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 414/1988
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia. Principio de congruencia: inexistencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Pedro Luis Ferrero Rodríguez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Santander, que revoca la del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 1 de Torrelavega y condena por delito de desobediencia. Invoca la vulneración del
derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las Sentencia impugnada.
containers
Visualización
containers