Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 497/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:497A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to direct judicial responsibility for conviction and lack of constitutional demand content.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 497/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the violation of Article 24.1 of the Constitution was directly attributable to the judicial organs' actions. The applicants, convicted of robbery, argued for a suspension of execution based on procedural defects in the trial. The court rejected this, ruling that the judiciary cannot be held liable for its own judgments and that the appeal lacked sufficient constitutional content.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The violation of the right to a court cannot be imputed to the judicial organs when they are the direct authors of the decision, and an appeal must contain specific constitutional arguments to be admissible.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
judicial responsibility direct attribution right to court constitutional demand inadmissible appeal procedural defect suspension of execution

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicitan la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia impugnada.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 135-1988

Fecha de resolución

25/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 135/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Imputabilidad directa de la violación a acción u omisión del órgano judicial: inexistencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Mateo Martínez Valero y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Badajoz que, en apelación, confirma la del Juzgado de Instrucción de Almendralejo, condenatoria por delito de robo. Invocan la vulneración del

derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicitan la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia impugnada.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00497-1988_00135.pdf