Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 450/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:450A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of procedural standing regarding the right to a fair trial.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 450/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicants lacked the necessary procedural standing to challenge the conviction. The applicants, convicted of a public health offense, argued that their trial violated their right to a fair trial under Article 24.2 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this claim, ruling that the applicants could not invoke the right to a fair trial as a ground for inadmissibility in this specific procedural context.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.2 C.E.; The right to a fair trial does not grant standing to challenge a final conviction when the applicant has not exhausted the ordinary judicial remedies or lacks the requisite procedural interest to file the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
right to fair trial procedural standing exhaustion of remedies constitutional appeal final conviction

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.2 C.E.
vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las Sentencias recurridas

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1680-1987

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.680/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Juan Varela García y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencias de la Audiencia Provincial de Bilbao, condenatoria por delito contra la salud pública, y de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo, que la confirma en casación. Invoca la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las Sentencias recurridas

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00450-1987_01680.pdf