Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
AUTO 278/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:278A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to insufficient sentence motivation.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 278/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Carlos de Roselló Moreno against a provincial court judgment. The appellant argued that the lower court's decision violated Article 24.1 of the Constitution by failing to provide adequate reasoning. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the lack of detailed motivation in the contested sentence did not constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution is not violated by a lack of detailed motivation in a judgment if the decision remains legally sound and the procedural guarantees were respected.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection judicial motivation constitutional appeal Article 24.1 CE procedural guarantees

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1590-1987

Fecha de resolución

29/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.590/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Carlos de Roselló Moreno interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Tercera de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, que en apelación revoca la del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 12, en autos de cognición sobre reclamación de cantidad. Invoca

la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers