Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 160/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:160A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of legal interest due to effective judicial remedy availability.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 160/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant had already obtained effective judicial protection through the Supreme Court. The applicant, Carzuh S.L., argued that the labor court's dismissal decision violated Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Supreme Court had already reviewed and upheld the ruling. The court rejected the appeal since the existence of a final judicial decision rendered the constitutional complaint unnecessary and devoid of legal interest.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: When a final judicial decision exists, the right to effective judicial protection is satisfied, rendering the constitutional appeal inadmissible for lack of legal interest.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection legal interest requirement final judicial decision constitutional appeal inadmissibility Article 24.1 Constitution

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 de la C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1396-1987

Fecha de resolución

01/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.396/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Carzuh, Sociedad Limitada», interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo que estima recurso de casación contra la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 4 de Vigo, en autos sobre despido. Invoca la vulneración

del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 de la C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00160-1987_01396.pdf