Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects under Estonian law.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Tartu Regional Court dismissed the enforcement application for a foreign judgment against the defendant. The plaintiff argued the judgment was final and enforceable, while the defendant contested jurisdiction and procedural irregularities. The court ruled that the foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the defendant and failed to observe Estonian procedural requirements, thus refusing enforcement.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 3 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment cannot be enforced in Estonia if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction or if the proceedings did not comply with Estonian procedural rules.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
!
" # $%%&'$( )
* " ) + ,))-. /'##/('## .0 1) 2) ) - " ) +) ) - ) "- ) )*
!
! - " ) + $3 11 * - - "- )
/ ,4"0 1
) "-)
11 )
-) 44- 1) )
) ) "" )
" # $ "%
$3 11 * " 5" ) ) 6 ) ) "" &#( * ,11 " ( ( #&3(#0 ) +) 11 - ) # ") "- - )* / 1
'3 ) 1)
) ) "1 " ) + '3
)
1)
"- * "
44- " 1 "- ) 11 )
)- "" "- )
*)
1 "-) "- ) 11 )
)"*)"- )
"-
" * "*"- - "- )
- 11
1) )
" "- - 44- " "- ) "-)
-
! # ) "- -
"-)
1) )
) )- 4))
! # 11 - ) +
$3 11 * 11 - "- ) "-)