1-08-3751\2 Generato dall'IA

Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects. Foreign court lacked jurisdiction; domestic court found no grounds for enforcement. Judgment dismissed due to jurisdictional flaws and procedural errors. Foreign court lacked jurisdiction; domestic court found no grounds for enforcement. Judgment dismissed due to jurisdictional flaws and procedural errors.

Numero d'incarto 1-08-3751\2

Autorità giudiziaria Tartu Maakohus Võru kohtumaja Põlvas

Giurisdizione

Estonia (EE)

Data della decisione 2008-04-07

Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Tartu Regional Court dismissed the enforcement application against a foreign judgment rendered in Estonia. The applicant argued the foreign court had jurisdiction, but the court found the proceedings violated Estonian procedural rules and lacked proper jurisdiction. Consequently, the court refused to recognize and enforce the foreign decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment may not be enforced if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction or if the proceedings violated fundamental principles of Estonian law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

enforcement of foreign judgments lack of jurisdiction procedural defects recognition and enforcement international civil procedure

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.

Testo completo

!" #

$ %$

(

%)$%&*#

++)!'

-& &" (

.)/

0102

! 3)

#"$!&

&(! && # ( $&( $"!

4# $"! , -& &" (

!## (!' ) &(! && # (

,&( & '( )) ! 3) , -& &" (

$&( &(! && # ( $"! + !55)!

# $!## 3'!

,#3!( $ $ &)

6 %)$)"+7&4 (

'(".!)!+!! &)2&38 &)$%&

*# ++)!' ,-& &" (! (

8 ,#3 !' , -& &" ( .!) !+!! &)2 & 3 8

& !##) 3 !$ ( $ .)

&)!& !

$ )&

&&(&00+ 3 !## 3'!

) !#)/$ &!" 818;)&!;3

&!" &&('3 &);!(+ &) (#) 2

## $'" )!## " *'$!3 # $

3 )!

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$%

<80( $'" #! 3#( !#!&

# ++)!' ) < 0 $' # ) 3

#&)!$")++)!' $&( &(! && #3' !

<0( $'" ! ! ! & !

++)!' ) 3( &(! && # ( $&( $");

++)!' & ( # &)&) $# ! !&) !' )

18 ( .$&( ! ; ) 102

,-& &" (. &)& &2 <) (;838(3#(

$&( (

( .$&( ! ; ) 82

,-& &" (. &)& &2 <11(8;3#( $&( (

!## (.$&(!; 802!' <

0 ( &! ) 3#( , -& &" ( . &)& &2

$&(

( &&" , -& &" ( ( 7 ! &&( &

( #&)!&) 83)

$&(

4# & ! =!& ! $&( &(! && # (

$"! <0(3#(

< 0 ( # "; 3(&(! && # ($&( $"!

! $ " ! & ! 3); ++)!' ;

$ ! # &&( #! &)! 3; ! ! &(! 3

& ) (3#(; !) $'" ++)!' &(! && # (

$"!&

; && $&( ) ! 3 3 # ++)!' &&(

5 3 3 $! ; "; ++)!' " 3# $&( &(!

&& #3' !$"!

9 !#() 3 ' &) .$&( ! ; ) 82

&#"; && # $ !'!&++)!' )!&

8 $&( (; 3 ' $$ () ; 3

55$! &)$ 3)

# $3&&"$&(&$( 3$#(!

,&( &)! 3& ++)!' ) )$)&.$

$&(!; );8;8;08;;10;8;1;;32&&(

!" $))&;! $!& !##

("&)3) 3# ) ; ++)!' &; (

#&)

)

&&(

)

%$ ) 3; ++)!' &) ($&(3# $$ &(!

) ) )& 3 #) '( ; #

&);$!#&)$&(3 &)$ &)!; ++)!'

&) & ! 3 $'! & $") ! ) (

3 +&&! ( !#!& ! (

( )$'! ($")$&( &(! && # (

%$ ) & $ () ! & ! 3); ++)!' &&(

$&(+ !!; "$3,&( ) <0

(3 <80( !##; $&(" )) ! 3)

++)!' $&( &(! && # ( $"! +

!55)! # $!## 3'!

++)!' ( '(" !##) 3; )$ %& *# .

%)$)"+ 7& 4 2 '(") +$! ;8

"; & '3 &)) 3 " )) 3!& 0

!## ( & >( '(" ! !$ $ ! );

!! )3!##)&&(('(") +$! 3)?<)

(31(; ( $ ))$ &) $ ")$)"+

$#3!' )!! <(&( " !!$#3

!'++)!' (

!" #

Sintesi Legislator

Regesto Legislator

Parole chiave

Disposizioni normative citate

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Testo completo