4-08-1184\5 Generato dall'IA

Court dismissed criminal appeal against conviction for theft due to lack of evidence regarding the stolen item's identity.

Numero d'incarto 4-08-1184\5

Autorità giudiziaria Pärnu Maakohus Rapla kohtumaja

Giurisdizione

Estonia (EE)

Data della decisione 2008-02-21

Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Pärnu County Court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for theft. The prosecution alleged the defendant stole a specific item, but the defense argued the evidence failed to identify the stolen property. The court upheld the conviction because the prosecution successfully proved the defendant's intent and actions, even if the specific item remained unidentified.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Criminal Code § 160; Criminal Procedure Code § 209: A conviction for theft is valid if the prosecution proves the defendant's intent and act, even if the specific stolen item cannot be positively identified.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

theft conviction criminal appeal unidentified property burden of proof criminal procedure

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Criminal Code § 160

Criminal Procedure Code § 209

Testo completo

! "# $ % &

&# & ' # (()*) #

+ ! ! ,,,,,,,# ,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,#

" -- #

++! . & + ! ! / ) & '

0 ! & 1

& !&

1 &

& ' ! *

' &

2 ! . & + ! ! / ) !

4 !! ! // (# # # ( #

& )5 66 ( )

7 ! ++!

& '

. & + !

! /

) & & ! !

' &0

$ ! ! ! & &

' 0 !

7 ) &# # ! $ 0 * &#

0 & #

! " '

Court dismissed criminal appeal against conviction for theft due to lack of evidence regarding the stolen item's identity.

Sintesi Legislator

Regesto Legislator

Parole chiave

Disposizioni normative citate

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Testo completo