Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
SS-27293/2019-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2025:SS0000000386 Generato dall'IA

Court dismisses appeal regarding illegal expiration of prosecution for drug offense under Danish Criminal Law.

Numero d'incarto SS-27293/2019-KBH
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court dismissed the appeal against the decision on lawful expiration of prosecution for a drug-related offense. The prosecution alleged violations of the Criminal Law and drug legislation, while the defense argued the statute of limitations had expired. The court ruled that the procedural requirements for expiration were met, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1; The court established that the prosecution for drug offenses expires according to statutory time limits if no action is taken within the prescribed period.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lawful expiration of prosecution drug offenses Criminal Law Denmark statute of limitations criminal appeal procedural dismissal euphoric substances revoca dell'annullamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1
tiltale for overtrædelse af straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1, og lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer
lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer
1, og lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer
Generato dall'IA
SS-229/2022-OLR
Appeal dismissed as late; prosecution failed to meet strict time limits for enforcing Danish sentence.
SS-1190/2021-OLR
Appeal dismissed because defendant failed to appear without documented legal excuse in criminal proceedings.
SS-483/2009-OLR
Appeal dismissed because prosecution failed to meet strict deadline for filing appeal against defendant.
SS-176/2025-GLR
Appeal dismissed because defendant failed to prove lawful absence from court without valid excuse.
BS-1923/2016-OLR
Appeal allowed because digital filing after office hours counts as timely under new statute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sag om anke og lovligt forfald, vedr. tiltale for overtrædelse af straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1, og lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.