Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BS-1634/2015-ALB ECLI:DK:ALB:2022:BS0000000841 Generato dall'IA

Court rejects expert dismissal request due to insufficient grounds based on price estimate and case scope.

Numero d'incarto BS-1634/2015-ALB
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court ruled that there was insufficient basis to dismiss the expert witness Person 1 based on the parties' objections. The court noted the price estimate and the scope of the inquiry but found these factors inadequate for rejection. Consequently, the expert was appointed unless the opposing party withdrew the request or agreed to a different expert by the deadline.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

s. 106 af Rettsplejeloven; s. 107 af Rettsplejeloven: The court must evaluate objections to an expert witness appointment; a price estimate alone does not constitute sufficient grounds for dismissal if the expert's qualifications and the case scope are otherwise appropriate.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
expert witness appointment objections to expert price estimate relevance court discretion civil procedure rules parzialità dell'esperto perizia di parte esperto in materia di previdenza professionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
s. 106 af Rettsplejeloven
s. 107 af Rettsplejeloven
Generato dall'IA
SS-1565/2016-OLR
Appeal dismissed; court upholds lower court ruling allowing authorized lawyer assistant to represent appointed defender in extension hearing.
BS-44623/2021-KBH
Employment termination damages partially allowed; court rejects unsupported claims and awards costs.
BS-51536/2024-VLR
Court upholds police liability for dog injury, rejecting insurer's direct claim exclusion.
BS-43951/2018-HEL
Court allowed appeal against administrative decision regarding Part A ApS case resumption.
BS-2663/2007-ROS
Court awarded attorney fees to plaintiff against defendants and state treasury in civil litigation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sag om, hvorvidt sagkyndige kan afvises

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) RETTEN I AALBORG

Udskrift af retsbogen

Den 15. marts 2016 kl. 15:15 blev retten sat på dommerens kontor af Dommer

Der blev foretaget i ikke offentligt retsmøde sag nr. BS 99-1634/2015:

Part 1 (Enkeltmandsvirksomhed)

Adresse 1 9600 Aars mod Part A Adresse 2 9600 Aars

Ingen var indkaldt eller mødt.

Der blev fremlagt:

- udspecificering af prisoverslaget fra Person 1 ,

- mail af 2. marts 2016 fra advokat Jan Poulsen,

- mail af 7. marts 2016 fra advokat Erik Braad.

Efter de foreliggende oplysninger, herunder oplysningerne om prisoverslaget sammenholdt med spørgetemaets omfang og karakter finder retten, at der ikke er tilstrækkeligt grundlag for at afvise Person 1 som sagkyndig på baggrund af parternes indsigelser.

Retten forventer derfor at udmelde Person 1 som sagkyndig, medmindre sagsøgtes advokat senest den 22. marts 2016 oplyser, at begæringen om indhentelse af sagkyndig erklæring tilbagekaldes, eller at parterne senest samme dato bliver enige om en anden sagkyndig.

Sagen udsat.

Retten hævet.

Dommer