Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BS-2113/2007-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2023:BS0000005346 Generato dall'IA

Claim dismissed because plaintiff failed to prove the arbitration clause designates Copenhagen District Court.

Numero d'incarto BS-2113/2007-KBH
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The plaintiff's claim was dismissed because they failed to substantiate that the contract's dispute resolution clause specifically designates the Copenhagen District Court. The court noted the agreement stated disputes would be solved in a Danish court but lacked specificity regarding the exact venue. Consequently, the court could not refer the case to the correct jurisdiction and rejected the action under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Retsplejelovens § 248, stk. 2; A claim for jurisdiction is dismissed when the plaintiff fails to prove the contractual dispute resolution clause designates the specific court where the action is filed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
jurisdictional dispute arbitration clause venue designation contractual agreement code of civil procedure plaintiff burden court referral violazione dei diritti di parte

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Retsplejelovens § 248, stk. 2
retsplejelovens § 248, stk. 2.
Generato dall'IA
BS-2704/2008-OLR
Court dismisses appeal, remands case to correct venue based on service contract and jurisdiction rules.
BS-5643/2022-HJR
Court dismisses claim that a dissolved partnership created a silent company with shareable ownership.
BS-1517/2009-VLR
Court dismisses claim for jurisdiction in Denmark as performance place is Spain under Brussels I Regulation.
SKS-543/2010-KOL
Court allows bankruptcy petition without notice as debtor's lawyer was informed and debtor remained at registered address.
BS-940/2007-VLR
Court dismisses appeal against by-court judgment, upholding conviction for illegal possession of firearms.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sag om værneting

[DOKUMENT] Dom (1 sider) Københavns Byret

Udskrift af dombogen

DOM

afsagt den 7. maj 2007 i sag nr. BS 14A-2113/2007:

Glenco A/S Stamholmen 110 2650 Hvidovre mod TEAM, Tecnologia Europa Alpicada al Movimiento S.L. Buonos Aires E-08029 Barcelona Spain

Af en mellem parterne indgået kontrakt, der er fremlagt som bilag 3, fremgår blandt andet: "if any disagreements should arise between the parties, they will be solved according to Danish Law in a Danish court."

Rettens begrundelse:

Sagsøger har ikke med sagens bilag 3 godtgjort, at parterne har aftalt, at sa-gen skal anlægges ved Københavns Byret. Da retten ikke kan henvise sagen til rette domstol, afvises sagen, jf. retsplejelovens § 248, stk. 2.

Thi bestemmes:

Sagen afvises.

Dommer

STD061958-S01-ST01-K199-T3-L01-M00-P01-\D3