Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BS-2824/2012-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:BS0000001328 Generato dall'IA

Court dismisses appeal confirming lower court's decision denying representation rights to a non-lawyer.

Numero d'incarto BS-2824/2012-VLR
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Vestre Landsret upheld the Aalborg District Court's decision denying Part A's right to act as a court representative. Part A challenged the ruling, arguing they should be permitted to represent the defendant in the proceedings. The court found no merit in the appeal and confirmed the lower court's finding that the individual lacked the necessary qualification to represent the party.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; Section 10 of the Rules of Civil Procedure: A person without a legal qualification is not entitled to represent a party in civil proceedings as a court representative.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
court representation legal qualification civil procedure rules non-lawyer representative appeal dismissal difetto di legittimazione dell'azionista difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico rappresentanza valida

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Rules of Civil Procedure
Generato dall'IA
BS-1017/2010-VLR
Vestre Landsret upheld the byret's decision, finding no principled issue requiring review.
BS-2481/2011-OLR
Court dismisses appeal claiming lawyer's prior representation makes service of process valid under statute.
BS-51536/2024-VLR
Court upholds police liability for dog injury, rejecting insurer's direct claim exclusion.
SS-2137/2008-OLR
Appeal dismissed; no lawyer appointed as insufficient grounds for appointment under § 1019e of the Code of Civil Procedure were found.
SS-3369/2024-OLR
Court dismisses appeal against city court decision due to insufficient interpretation requiring remand for retrial.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Byrettens afgørelse stadfæstes, i sag om hvorvidt en person kan anses for berettiget til at repræsentere sagsøgte

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) Vestre Landsret holdt den 21. november 2012 kl. 14.00 møde på tingstedet i Viborg.

Som dommere fungerede landsdommerne Hanne Kildal, Stig Glent-Madsen og Berit Viegaard Andersson (kst.).

V.L. B–2824–12

Part A

mod Aalborg Kommune

Fremlagte bilag:

 kæreskrift  breve af 9. og 15. november 2012 fra Retten i Aalborg  udskrift af domog retsbogen (sag nr. BS 2-2638/2011).

Ved afgørelse af 23. oktober 2012 har Retten i Aalborg bestemt, at Person 1 ikke anses for berettiget til som rettergangsfuldmægtig at repræsentere Part A under sagen.

Afgørelsen er kæret af Part A .

Landsretten afsagde

K e n d e l s e:

Landsretten er enig i byrettens resultat og begrundelsen herfor. Landsretten stadfæster derfor byrettens afgørelse.

T h i b e s t e m m e s:

Byrettens afgørelse stadfæstes.

Kæremålets omkostninger ophæves. Sagen sluttet.

Hanne Kildal