Court dismisses request for expert opinion on asylum claim due to lack of necessity and procedural defects.

The court dismissed the applicant's request for an expert opinion regarding the asylum claim. The applicant argued that the existing file was insufficient to assess the risk of persecution, while the opposing party contended the request was procedurally flawed and unnecessary. The court ruled that the request lacked a clear basis for necessity and failed to meet procedural requirements, thus rejecting the application.