Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BS-2119/2006-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:BS0000000863 Generato dall'IA

New filing after first dismissal rejected as exceeding the statutory time limit for initiating proceedings.

Numero d'incarto BS-2119/2006-VLR
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request to initiate new proceedings following a prior rejection. The plaintiff argued that the delay was justified by unforeseen circumstances, while the opposing party contended the filing strictly violated the procedural deadline. The court ruled that the statutory time limit is mandatory and cannot be extended without specific statutory grounds, leading to the dismissal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Retplejeloven § 253, stk. 1 og 2; The statutory time limit for initiating civil proceedings is a mandatory requirement that cannot be extended by the parties or the court absent specific statutory exceptions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedural time limit initiation of proceedings statutory deadline first instance dismissal civil procedure law termini processuali proroga tardiva del termine termine di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Retplejeloven § 253, stk. 1 og 2
Generato dall'IA
BS-260/2007-HJR
Supreme Court allows new lawsuit filing after dismissal by extending the statute of limitations period.
BS-1322/2010-OLR
Appeal court overturns dismissal of small claims case due to non-attendance at a permitted telephone hearing.
BS-1504/2014-VLR
Court dismissed appeal as bankruptcy filing deadline under Section 81 of the Bankruptcy Act was not met.
BS-1577/2007-OLR
Appeal dismissed for non-appearance; failure to appear at hearing triggers automatic dismissal under procedural law.
BS-327/2007-HJR
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds, rejecting new arguments after residence permit granted.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sag om, hvorvidt sagsanlæggelse på ny, efter landsrettens første afvisningsbeslutning, overholder søgsmålsfristen, jf. retsplejelovens § 253, stk. 1 og 2