Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BS-1693/2004-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:BS0000000612 Generato dall'IA

Court dismisses appeal against lease extension order due to minor breach of lease terms.

Numero d'incarto BS-1693/2004-VLR
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Vestre Landsret dismissed the tenant's appeal regarding the lease extension order issued by the byret. The tenant argued for a stay of execution based on the size of the property and the length of the breach, while the landlord contended the breach was immaterial. The court ruled that the breach was of minor significance under Section 94 of the Lease Act, thereby upholding the lower court's decision to extend the lease.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 94, paragraph 1 of the Lease Act; A breach of lease terms is considered immaterial if its significance is minor, allowing the court to order a lease extension despite the breach.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lease extension immaterial breach lease act section 94 tenant appeal lease termination diritto di riprendere il possesso della cosa procedura di realizzazione del pegno immobiliare opposizione al precetto esecutivo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 94, paragraph 1 of the Lease Act
Generato dall'IA
BS-3062/2008-OLR
Appeal dismissed because tenant and landlord were already moved in/out, eliminating the dispute.
BS-2284/2010-VLR
Court dismisses appeal against lease termination ruling, upholding landlord's right to terminate due to tenant's breach of contract.
FS-10562/2017-ODE
Fogedretten denies witness testimony in a tenancy dispute due to the case's reliance on contractual basis.
BS-210/2011-OLR
Commercial lease termination upheld; tenant must vacate by April 30, 2012, under Business Lease Act.
BS-125/2025-OLR
Land court upheld lower court ruling on seizure, remanding partial case for retrial due to improper notice timing.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Landsretten afviser byrettens afgørelse om udsættelse af lejemål

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) Den 20. augusE 2oo4 k1. l-1 .L5 blev VesEre LandsreE sat pa EingstedeE. i Viborg af Landsdorunerne OLav D. Larsen, Wiirtzen og Gorm Sagaard Lund (ksts.). Anonymrseret var retssekretar,

M@dets var offentligts.

Der foreloges:

v.L. B-t 693-04

Kerende mod lndkarede

Der fremlagrdes:

Brev af 25. juli 2OO4 fra FogedretE.en i Arhus.

sagens ovrtge bilag var tiI stede.

Der afsagdes folgende

K e n d e 1 s e:

I betragtning af bel@bets storrelse og frisE.overskridelsens langde fiades Karendes misligholdelse af 1ej eaftsalen at vare af uvasentlig beEydning, jf. Iej elovens S 94, stk. 1_

Derfor nagtes forreEningen fremme.

Thi bestelnmes:

Forretaingen Eagtea f rerlee.

Karemelet€ omkos tninger ophaves.

Kareafgiftseu tilbagebetales tsi1 kareude.

Sagen slutsEets.

ReE.ten havel-

Olaw D. Larsen

Ilden betaling,

Udskrif teas rigtighed bekraf tes. VesEre IJandBreE, viborg, den 12, j anuar 2oU.

Anonyr-r ser-e t retasekretar